Legal Opinion

Michalopoulos v. C & D RESTAURANT, INC.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 8, 2001No. 99-222-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

After a jury trial in this negligence action, the defendant, C & D Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a “Eddie and Conrad’s Fine Foods” (the defendant), appeals from the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law; the admission of certain expert opinion testimony; and the trial justice’s reapportionment of liability between the parties after granting the plaintiffs motion for an additur. The case came before a single justice of this Court, who directed the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After reviewing the memoranda…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skaling v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. McLaughlin v. MouraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Cotrona v. Johnson & Wales CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  4. Gardiner v. SchobelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Allen v. SkeldingSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michalopoulos v. C & D RESTAURANT, INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Hefner v. DistelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. Bradley v. Gilchrist, 98-3355 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Conant v. ZeryaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Lapierre v. Burrillville Racing Assn., 98-4605 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API