Legal Opinion

Rotenberg v. Richards

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1995No. 94CA1358PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

In this action to collect attorney fees, plaintiff, Lawrence Rotenberg, appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Robert M. Richards, based upon the statute of limitations. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In March 1988, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written retainer agreement pursuant to which plaintiff was to represent defendant with respect to defendant’s personal injury claim. The agreement provided, generally, that plaintiff would be paid a percentage of the gross amount of money or benefit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. The Great Western Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  3. Comfort Homes, Inc. v. PetersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Mohawk Green Apartments v. KramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Luttgen v. FischerColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Torres-Vallejo v. CreativExteriors, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  3. Portercare Adventist Health System v. LegoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  5. Fishburn v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API