Federal Trade Commission v. Innovative Marketing, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) brought this case under sections 5(a) and 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b), for injunctive and other equitable relief against a group of corporate entities and individuals for alleged deceptive conduct in connection with the sale of software. Specifically, the FTC alleges that two companies, Defendants Innovative Marketing, Inc. (“Innovative Marketing”) and ByteHosting Internet Services, LLC (“Bytehosting”) operated as a common enterprise (the “IMI…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sivetts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Ameristone Tile, LLC v. Ceramic Consulting Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- Aviles-Cervantes v. Outside Unlimited, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Jones v. Ram Medical, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.