Legal Opinion

Bodoy v. North Arundel Hospital

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 20, 1996No. Civil K-94-2404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Angelo L. Bodoy (“Bodoy”) contends that his former employer, North Arundel Hospital (“North Arundel”), 1 and certain of its supervisors, managers, and/or officers, namely Philip Engers, Frank Florentino, T. Wyatt Medicus, David McGunigale, James Walker, and Charles Wilson, violated Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”), by subjecting him to unequal discipline and work conditions, harassment, unequal opportunities for advancement, retaliation for engaging in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
  2. Thomas v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
  3. Yancey v. National Center on Institutions & AlternativesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  4. Shoaf v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  5. Martin v. Orthodontic Centers of South Carolina, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API