Legal Opinion

Howes v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 7, 2003No. 06-03-00030-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Whether Ralph Hugh Howes was observed for at least the mandatory fifteen minutes before he was given an intoxilyzer test is central to his appeal from his conviction and seventy-five year sentence for felony driving while intoxicated.

The evidence shows that Howes was stopped by a local policeman, Fred Ellis, and his partner, at about 11:00 p.m. in Gladewater, Texas. Ellis gave Howes var ious field sobriety tests and, based on Howes’ poor results, arrested him. The activities were videotaped by the officer’s car-based camera, and the videotape bears a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  2. James Hilton Bond, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Kevin Lee Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. Melissa Marie Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. Melissa Marie Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API