Visalia Retail, LP v. City of Visalia
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPoochigian, Acting P.J.
*354*5This appeal involves a challenge to an update of the City of Visalia's (Visalia) general plan. Included in the update is a land use policy affecting areas designated "Neighborhood Commercial." Under the policy, no tenant in a Neighborhood Commercial area may be larger than 40,000 square feet in size.
Appellant claims Visalia violated the California Environmental Quality Act ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. ; "CEQA") by failing to analyze the potential for the land use policy to cause a phenomenon called urban decay. "CEQA does not define urban decay" but some have defined it as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Christopher R. Bonander v. Patrick CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Denham, LLC v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Make UC a Good Neighbor v. Regents of University of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Make UC a Good Neighbor v. The Regents of the University of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. Velazquez CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.