School Committee v. Selectmen of Winchendon
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
Appeals from probate courts are governed *267by equity practice. This was true to a large extent under R L. (1902) c. 162, § 15 (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 215, § 21). Chapman v. Chapman, 224 Mass. 427, 428. Ensign v. Faxon, 229 Mass. 231, 233. See also as to equity cases, Burroughs v. Wellington, 211 Mass. 494, 496. It was made true generally by St. 1919, c. 274 (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 215, §§ 9-18, 22). Mackintosh, petitioner, 246 Mass. 482. Littlejohn v. Littlejohn, 236 Mass. 326. Drew v. Drew, 250 Mass. 41. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Wickham, 254 Mass. 471, 473. Goss v. Donnell, 263 Mass. 521.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Drew v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Chapman v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Goss v. DonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Bratt v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Slater v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Mancuso v. MancusoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.