Legal Opinion

in Re Eurecat US, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 27, 2014No. 14-13-00852-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed February 27, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00852-CV IN RE EURECAT US, INC., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-25700 DISSENTING OPINION “Eurecat U.S., Inc. may not serve discovery on any customers or potential customers of catalyst activation services identified in the letter from Mr. Touchstone to Mr. Escobar dated September 18, 2013.” This order is a discovery injunction. I would grant this Petition for Writ of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API