Legal Opinion
In Re Chittenden Solid Waste District
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 20, 1995No. 94-223PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Allen, CJ.
Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) appeals from a decision of the Chittenden Superior Court dismissing a petition for condemnation of land owned by the appellee, Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Company (HS&G). We reverse.
CSWD is a union municipal district organized in 1987 under 24 V.S.A. §§ 4861-4868. It sought to condemn property in Williston owned by HS&G and used to supply sand for its sand blending and supply business in Hinesburg. CSWD filed its superior court petition pursuant to 24 V.S.A. chapter 61, subchapter 13 in August 1992, detailing facts supporting necessity for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Highway Board v. LoomisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. GrabowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- State Highway Board v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Ship Creek Hydraulic Syndicate v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State Highway Board v. HazenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Co. v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Chittenden Solid Waste District v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999