Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Love
Texas Supreme Court
Original application by the insurance company to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against Love as Commissioner of Insurance and Banking.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, a New York Life Insurance Company, and Patrick J. Donovan, one of its policy-holders, have applied for a writ of mandamus from this court to require the respondent to grant to it a permit to pursue its business in this State. They aver a compliance with all of the statutory provisions of this State prescribing the conditions upon which it is made respondent's duty to issue the permit, except those of the Act of 1907, known as the "Robertson Act" (Laws 30th Leg., p. 316), with which plaintiffs admit the company has not complied and does not intend to comply. They contend that…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Box v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- City of McAllen v. Daniel, Atty. Gen.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- Anderson v. GrossenbacherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Baughman v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Pace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913