Pace v. State

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted for keeping and being concerned in keeping a house where spirituous, vinous and malt liquors were sold and kept for sale in quantities of one gallon and less without having obtained a license to retail such liquors.

There was no error in permitting the State to prove' by E. J. Erwin and others that the general reputation of the house alleged as a place where intoxicating liquors were sold was bad. Joliff v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 61.

In the second bill of exceptions it is shown that appellant offered to introduce testimony that he had…