Estate of Lopes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a will admission to probate because it was expressly revoked by a subsequent will. (See Prob. Code, § 1240. 1 ) The original of the subsequent will has not been produced and, by stipulation, it cannot meet one of the conditions imposed by section 350 2 for its admission to probate as a lost or destroyed will. Nonetheless, we hold the revocation clause in the subsequent will may be given effect resulting in the distribution of the estate by the rules of intestacy. We will affirm the judgment.
Facts
Joe Lopes died, a single man, on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Moramarco v. MoramarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Estate of RubenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Matter of Estate of KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Estate of SaueressigCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- IN RE: ESTATE OF SCHEIDE, JR.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.