Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Thompson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1921No. L. A. No. 6354PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

Respondent, the sister of the deceased, filed a will dated May 13, 1908, for probate. The surviving husband, the appellant, filed a contest of this will on the ground that the will had been revoked by a later will executed November 25,1916, which will he alleged had been destroyed without the intention of reviving the former will. Thereupon the sister filed a petition for the admission to probate of the will of 1916 as a lost or destroyed will. She also answered the contest of the will of 1908 by denying that the will of 1916 had been destroyed with the intention to revoke the same. Appellant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Pickens v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Aldrich v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Blackett v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Giles v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Crosby v. Alton Ochsner Medical FoundationMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Crane v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Security-First National Bank v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API