Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goff

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2006No. S129110PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1047Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

A will that meets statutory requirements is effective upon the testator’s death. (Cook v. Cook (1941) 17 Cal.2d 639, 646 [111 P.2d 322] (Cook); Estate of Lopes (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 302, 305 [199 Cal.Rptr. 425] (Lopes).) Probate Code section 6110 requires a will be signed by two witnesses.1 The question here is whether the signature of a witness affixed after the testator’s death satisfies the statute. We conclude that such postdeath subscription is not permitted, and reverse the contrary Court of Appeal judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background2

On December 26, 2000,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United States v. BurnisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of SaueressigCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API