Huggins v. Meriweather
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
I. “Specific performance is not a remedy which, either party can demand as a matter of absolute right, and will not in any given case be granted unless strictly equitable and just. Mere inadequacy of price may justify a court in refusing to decree a specific performance of a *462contract of bargain and sale; so also may any other fact showing the contract to be unfair, or unjust, or against good conscience. And in order to authorize specific performance of a contract, its terms must be clear, distinct, and definite. A petition for specific performance, which fails to allege a case authorizing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shropshire v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Crider v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Landrum v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Potts v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Coleman v. Woodland Hills CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Brogdon v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Chatham Amusement Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Whitehead v. DillardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.