Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Meriweather

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 9, 1933No. 9200PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

I. “Specific performance is not a remedy which, either party can demand as a matter of absolute right, and will not in any given case be granted unless strictly equitable and just. Mere inadequacy of price may justify a court in refusing to decree a specific performance of a *462contract of bargain and sale; so also may any other fact showing the contract to be unfair, or unjust, or against good conscience. And in order to authorize specific performance of a contract, its terms must be clear, distinct, and definite. A petition for specific performance, which fails to allege a case authorizing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Crider v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Landrum v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Potts v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Coleman v. Woodland Hills CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Brogdon v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Chatham Amusement Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  5. Whitehead v. DillardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API