Legal Opinion

Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1886No. 12,682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was an application by Samuel M-Smith against The Midland Railway Company, under sections 906 and 909, R. S. 1881, for the assessment of damages on account of the survey and location of the company’s-line of road over the applicant’s land.

The application, which was filed in vacation of the court, below, averred that the applicant, Smith, was the owner in fee simple of the east half of the northwest quarter of section three (3), in township eighteen (18) north, range three (3). east, in the county of Hamilton, in this State; that said company had surveyed and located its road-bed west…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Beeber v. BevanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Coulter v. CoulterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Roush v. EmerickIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Midland Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. CharltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API