Legal Opinion

Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1890No. 14,396PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— In August, 1885, Smith made application in pursuance of sections 906-909, E. S. 1881, for a writ for the assessment of damages, alleging that the railway company had located, and was about to proceed with the construction of, its road across his land without having made or tendered any compensation for the accruing damages, and without having taken any steps to have the amount of compensation assessed or fixed by agreement.

A former judgment for damages in pursuance of the application thus made was reversed, because the description of the land appropriated, as required by the statute, was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brookville & Metamora Hydraulic Co. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RedmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Co. v. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Morgan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Toledo & Chicago Interurban Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. McClarren v. Jefferson School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API