Roush v. Emerick
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
— John Emerick and Diana Emerick agreed in writing with Daniel Roush, to rent to him two* farms, from April, 1878, to April, 1881.
Roush was living on one of the farms; on the other, which was called the Stanton farm, the Emericks were living, and were to continue living there — they occupied the house and barn there. Roush was to farm both farms as he should think best for the interest of all parties, and by way of rent was to* deliver every year to the Emericks one-half of all the products of said farms, except the potatoes and hay • he was to> deliver only one-third of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Indiana Central Railway Co. v. BradleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Board of Trustees v. HustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Way v. FravelIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- McCutchen v. McCutchenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- First National Bank v. EssexIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Midland Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1886