Legal Opinion

Byars v. City of Griffin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1929No. 6585PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The ruling announced in the first headnote does not require elaboration.

The proposed contract begins with certain preliminary statements explanatory of the reasons for making it. In sections 1 to 6 the company agrees to construct and equip, under the city’s supervision and with its approval, the pumping and transmission system to be paid for and owned by the company. The city is to continue to own and maintain its existing system of waterworks, so that it may be used as a distributing system. The two systems are to be physically connected, so that they may be jointly operated for the purpose…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Maffit v. City of DecaturIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Renfroe v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Tate v. City of ElbertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. State v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. State Ports Authority v. ArnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Dejarnette v. Hospital Authority of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Miller v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API