Legal Opinion

Enron Oil & Gas Co. v. Worth

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 19, 1997No. 88285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying the plaintiffs quest for an injunction to prevent surface owners from interfering with seismic exploration for minerals. The issue is whether the owner of an unleased, undivided mineral interest may authorize a third party to enter onto the surface of land owned by another to conduct seismic operations. Based upon our review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we reverse and remand with directions.

I

Defendant Virgil Worth and his mother, defendant Frieda M. Webb, own the surface of six quarter sections…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Hinds v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Sunray Oil Co. v. Cortez Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Mustang Production Company v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Knox v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimzey v. Flamingo Seismic Solutions Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Woody Investment, LLC v. Sovereign Eagle, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. McCRABB v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API