Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 26, 1979No. 51038PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

This was a trespass action for damages occasioned by entrant’s allegedly unauthorized construction of a pipeline from a producing well upon, and thence across, landowner’s premises. Appeal was brought by landowner [Hinds] from summary judgment for the entrant, Phillips Petroleum Company [Phillips]. The dispositive issue presented is whether the oil-and-gas lessee of the property in question, Atlantic-Rich-field Company [Richfield], did, by “contract” with Phillips to sell and deliver cas-inghead gas at the well head on the premises in suit, effectively transfer to Phillips…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. DuLaney v. Oklahoma State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API