Legal Opinion
Austin v. Truly
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided November 20, 1986No. 09-85-145 CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
This appeal results from an action brought by the Appellee, Truly, on claims based on breach of contract and on the *915alternate theory of quantum meruit. The Appellants pleaded counterclaims against the Appellee alleging the breach of a contract as well as violation of duty. The trial was to the jury. The Special Issues were 10 in number. The verdict was rendered against the Appellants for the amount of $215,480.00 based largely on quantum me-ruit damages. An additional attorney’s fee was awarded to the Appellee.
The Appellants argue 52 points of error. We perceive…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Brazosport Bank of Texas v. Oak Park TownhousesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Fincher v. B & D Air Conditioning and Heating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Crest Construction, Inc. v. Murray, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Brazosport Bank of Texas v. Oak Park TownhousesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.