Legal Opinion

Crest Construction, Inc. v. Murray

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 17, 1995No. 09-93-225 CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

An appeal by Crest Construction, Incorporated (Crest) from an adverse judgment. The appeal involves certain sub-contracts on three different construction projects. These three projects were referred to during the trial and in the briefs as the “Borden Job”, the “Cooper Job”, and the “Beaumont Job”. On these three construction jobs, Jim Murray acted as a concrete sub-contractor under Crest. Murray’s performance or lack of completion thereon triggered this litigation. At this ..point in our opinion we visit no moral or ethical wrongdoing on Murray’s part.

Crest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murray v. Crest Construction, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Walker & Associates Surveying, Inc. v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  3. Robert L. Crill, Inc. v. Bond, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  4. Raymond Lopez v. Jesse D. Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Vicky McKenna v. Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API