JONES v. PORTER
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHARMAINE JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket no. 2:19-cv-00151-GZS ) ROBERT PORTER, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendant Robert Porter’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts II, III, V & X of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 22). Having reviewed the record as well as the parties’ legal memoranda, the Court GRANTS the Motion for the reasons explained below. I. LEGAL STANDARD Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Henriksen v. CameronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Stuart v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.