Legal Opinion

JONES v. PORTER

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 10, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00151Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHARMAINE JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket no. 2:19-cv-00151-GZS ) ROBERT PORTER, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendant Robert Porter’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts II, III, V & X of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 22). Having reviewed the record as well as the parties’ legal memoranda, the Court GRANTS the Motion for the reasons explained below. I. LEGAL STANDARD Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Henriksen v. CameronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Stuart v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API