Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1954No. Civ. 15730PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries and property damage against Russell Wright and several fictitious defendants. More than a year after the accident plaintiffs substituted and served an amended complaint on Herman J. Cox (known as Crazy Cox) designating him as the John Doe sued in the original complaint. The trial court granted Cox’s motion to strike this portion of the complaint. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of William J. Sullivan against both Wright and Cox for the damages to plaintiff’s car, in favor of Michael J. Sullivan for personal injuries against defendant Wright alone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Gates v. Wendling Nathan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. McKnight v. GilzeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Franceschi v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Lipman v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Jackson v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Williams v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API