Legal Opinion

In Re Housing Authority of City of Salisbury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1952No. 385Published

1Opinion of the Court

70 S.E.2d 500 (1952)

235 N.C. 463

In re HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SALISBURY, PROJECT NC-16-2.

No. 385.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 30, 1952.

Max Busby, Salisbury, for petitioner, Housing Authority of City of Salisbury, appellant.

Clement & Clement and Woodson & Woodson, Salisbury, for respondent, Trustees of Livingstone College, appellee.

JOHNSON, Justice.

In determining what property is necessary for a public housing site, a broad discretion is vested by statute in housing authority commissioners, to whom the power of eminent domain is delegated. G.S. § 157-11; G.S. § 157-50; G.S. §…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API