Cornish v. Wiessman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Heard on bill, answer, replication and proofs taken orally.
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
The object of this bill is to enforce certain restrictions in relation to the use of land which was conveyed by complainant, Mrs. Cornish, to defendant’s grantor, one James R. Schmidt. The deed from complainant to Schmidt conveyed a lot of land in Bloomfield, Essex county, fifty feet front on Broad street by one hundred and fifty feet deep, the conveyance containing the following clause at the end of the description: “ The above *611premises to be used for dwelling-house purposes only, with the necessary barn and outbuildings.” This deed was dated September 20th, 1895, and recorded…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Morrow v. HasselmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Walker v. HaslettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Olson v. JantauschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Rossi v. SierchioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.