Wilson v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant argues that, as she has not been found to be unfit to have custody of Richard, it was error for the trial court to award custody to the grandparents.
The court made no finding as to defendant’s fitness to have custody of her son. However, defendant is correct in her assertion that there is no evidence in the record that she is unfit. And it is the general rule that where one parent is dead, the surviving parent has a right to custody of their minor children, a right which should be denied only for “the most substantial” reasons. James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 104, 86…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Custody of StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Holmes v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In Re Custody of CraigoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woncik v. WoncikCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Best v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Woody v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997