Legal Opinion

Doucette v. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1931No. 22599. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Plaintiff's separate funds, which should have been credited to the joint account of the plaintiff and her husband with the defendant bank, were placed in the husband’s individual account with that bank. On two causes of action, the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant bank for the loss she claimed she sustained by her husband’s withdrawal of those funds from his individual account.

For her first cause of action plaintiff alleged that the defendant acquiesced in the fraud of the husband in placing the funds in the husband’s individual account; that the bank thereby treated that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gish Banking Co. v. Leachman's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stohr v. RandleWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Eatonville State Bank v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ketner Bros., Inc. v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API