Legal Opinion

Gish Banking Co. v. Leachman's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

The Grish Banking Company is a banking corporation at Central City, and doing a general banking business. *721Sam Leachman owned a house and lot in the town, which was conveyed to him by deed on May 25th, 1901. About the year 1908, he executed a note to appellant for a loan, and to secure it, he gave appellant a mortgage upon this house and lot, in which his wife, Lizzie .Leachman, joined. She, also, jointly with Sam Leachman, executed the note sued ón, but for what purpose, it does not appear, as she seems to have owned no property of her own.

This note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Finance & Trust Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Gardner v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leuzinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. National City Bank v. Harbin Electric Joint-Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Rush Ex Rel. Estate of Wright v. South Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Doucette v. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sullivan v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API