Legal Opinion

In re Cranmer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 1516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

Cranmer’s application for a patent on a device which consists of a, pneumatic tire casing of the standard beaded type, having incorporated within its- tread portion a transversely arched rigid reinforcing member, which is imbedded therein and covered with a layer of fabric to protect the inner air tube of the tire, was rejected by the Commissioner of Patents, and he appeals. Of the three appealed claims, we set out claim 1:

In a pneumatic vehicle tire curved in transverse section, having an elastic inflatable inner air tube and an outer fire casing, a rigid annular band,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  2. Edwards v. Dayton Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re GibsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API