Edwards v. Dayton Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. ° Suit for infringement of patents by Oliver M. Edwards against the Dayton Manufacturing Company. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Suit for infringement of United States patent No. 890,626 to Edwards, June 16, 1908, for improvement in window holding and fastening devices. The District Court held the patent' void for anticipation.
The device of the patent is sufficiently shown by Figs. 1, 2, and 3 of the patent drawings here reproduced, in which A is tire window frame, B the sash adapted to move up and down in guides a in the frame, which is provided with stops b. The two lower fastening devices, D and D', have each a wedge-headed bolt d, actuated by a spring s, which normally pushes the bolt…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. Concrete Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Keene v. New Idea Spreader Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. MeinkenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Condit v. Jackson Corset Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Elliott Core Drilling Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Gilchrist v. F. B. Mallory Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1921
- Central Brass Mfg. Co. v. Republic Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.