Legal Opinion

In re Gibson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1930No. 2298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the examiner denying all claims in appellant’s application for an alleged invention relating to a process of forming a “ mix ” for brake-shoe fillers.

Appellant has withdrawn from the appeal claims 3,10, and 11, and requests the court to recommend to the Patent Office the allowance of two new claims, 12 and 13. The latter claims were not in appellant’s application and were, therefore, not considered by the tribunals of the Patent Office.

Claims 1, 2, and 1 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

1.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re CranmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of George P. WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API