Legal Opinion

Schields v. Horbach

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1894No. 6777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motions to quash bills of exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtNoe val, C. J.

This was an action brought by defendant in error against Louis Schields to recover certain real estate situate in the-city of Omaha. Subsequently Doratha Schields filed a petition of intervention, and was made a party defendant. Horbach obtained a verdict in the district court, to reverse which the defendants prosecute a petition in error to this court.

Two bills of exceptions were settled and allowed, one-signed by Judge Ogden, which purports to contain a transcript of the evidence introduced upon the hearing in the court below on the motion of the plaintiff to exclude Edward R. Duffie from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Downing v. GaslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Smith v. KaiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Covey v. GaslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell v. CrookNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Marrow v. AmbroseNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Van Why v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Medland v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sorrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API