Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pearson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1941No. 5 Div. 336PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The jurisdiction of the Probate Court to entertain a proceeding contesting a will is a statutory and limited jurisdiction, and after the proceeding to probate the will has eventuated in a final decree admitting the will to probate the court is without jurisdiction to entertain a contest.

The language of the statute is: “A will, before the probate thereof, may be contested,” etc. [Italics supplied.] Code 1923, § 10625, Code 1940, Tit. 61, § 52; Ex parte Walter et al., 202 Ala. 281, 80 So. 119.

So, also, the jurisdiction conferred on the Circuit Court as a court of law by § 10636…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Ex Parte WalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Hurt v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Cox v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Evans v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Hooper v. HueySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Christian v. MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Boyd v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API