Legal Opinion
Love v. Barcelino Continental Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 23, 2021No. 3:19-cv-06684Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-06684-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 10 BARCELINO CONTINENTAL CORP., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Barcelino Continental Corp.’s motion for attorneys’ fees 14 and costs.1 (Dkt. No. 48.)2 After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes 15 that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the September 30, 16 2021 hearing, and DENIES the motion for the reasons explained…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kohler v. Bed Bath & Beyond of California, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jankey v. Song Koo LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.