Warsame v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Judge.
The issue this appeal presents is whether a substance controlled in Maryland by virtue of Maryland Code (1957,1992 Repl.Vol., 1994 Cum.Supp.), Art. 27, § 278(c)1 remains controlled despite the fact that the substance has never been listed in § 279, the Maryland schedule of controlled dangerous substances. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County found that it did. Accordingly, the court found Abraham Arah Warsame, the appellant, guilty of possession of Cathine,2 a schedule IV non narcotic controlled dangerous substance, with intent to distribute, suspended a term of imprisonment,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- United States v. Daahir CaseerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Stanford v. Maryland Police Training & Correctional CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.