Legal Opinion

Reed v. L. Hammel Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1927No. 1 Div. 424PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is for personal injuries alleged to be the result of negligence of the defendant or its employees.

Defendant owned and operated a public retail store in the city of Mobile. The plaintiff was a customer. While passing through the store toward the cashier’s office to pay her bill, she stumbled or tripped over the base of a weighing machine, penny in the slot weighing scales, and fell to the floor receiving some injuries.

The first count of the complaint, to which demurrer was sustained, is defective in failing to allege that defendant’s agents, servants, or employees, charged with the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Dwight Manufacturing Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Mayor of Birmingham v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Whitten v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Brown v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Murray v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API