Legal Opinion
Brach's Confections, Inc. v. McDougall
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 3, 2004No. 04 C 3116PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case arises under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1461. Plaintiff Brach’s Confections, Inc., (“Brach’s” or “Plaintiff’) claims that Defendant trustee Howard McDougall (“the Plan Sponsor”) and Defendant Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“the Plan”) (collectively “Defendants”) failed to provide information as required under 29 U.S.C. § 1401(e) for the calculation of Brach’s withdrawal Lability after Brach’s withdrew from the Plan. Defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Susan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Mary May v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Phencorp Reinsurance Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Sparknet Communications, L.P. v. Bonneville International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Veryzer v. American International Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- BRACH'S CONFECTIONS, INC. v. McDougallDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004