Symons Corp. v. Quality Concrete Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
On appeal, defendants Bissell and Rogers first contend that “[t]he trial court committed reversible error in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff . . . because plaintiff failed to give timely notice to appellants of said motion pursuant to . . . Rules 6(e) and 56(c).” We disagree.
As defendants correctly note, Rule 56(c) requires that “[t]he motion [for summary judgment] shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 56(c). Rule 6(e) allows a party an additional three days “to do some act or take some proceedings” when…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Falk Integrated Technologies, Inc. v. StackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Transformer Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Richardson v. Union County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Northland Cable Television, Inc. v. Highlands Cable Group, LpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Transformer Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996