Legal Opinion

Symons Corp. v. Quality Concrete Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1992No. 911SC976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

On appeal, defendants Bissell and Rogers first contend that “[t]he trial court committed reversible error in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff . . . because plaintiff failed to give timely notice to appellants of said motion pursuant to . . . Rules 6(e) and 56(c).” We disagree.

As defendants correctly note, Rule 56(c) requires that “[t]he motion [for summary judgment] shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 56(c). Rule 6(e) allows a party an additional three days “to do some act or take some proceedings” when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Falk Integrated Technologies, Inc. v. StackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Transformer Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Richardson v. Union County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Northland Cable Television, Inc. v. Highlands Cable Group, LpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Transformer Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API