Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Albourque v. Terry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2011No. 2010-2175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals treating the application of appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Steven J. Terry, for reconsideration as a motion for relief from judgment, granting it, and denying the request of appellant, Houssam Albourque, for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Terry to issue a new sentencing entry in Albourque’s criminal ease to comply with Crim.R. 32(C).

{¶ 2} The judge’s motion was styled “Application for Reconsideration.” App.R. 26(A)(1) allows for such motions only in “any cause or motion submitted on appeal.” The instant action was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Eubank v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Manuel v. StensonOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hazel v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Nannicola v. RosanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State ex rel. McGrath v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MajchrowiczOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Acosta v. MandrosOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API