Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Acosta v. Mandros

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2024No. 2024-0040Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 569.] THE STATE EX REL . ACOSTA, APPELLANT , v. MANDROS, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Acosta v. Mandros,

2024-Ohio-4891.] Mandamus—Inmate failed to state a mandamus claim because he had or has adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing complaint affirmed. (No. 2024-0040—Submitted July 23, 2024—Decided October 11, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-23-1252. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Kerr v. Pollex (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Boyd v. ToneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State ex rel Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API