State ex rel. Acosta v. Mandros
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 569.] THE STATE EX REL . ACOSTA, APPELLANT , v. MANDROS, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Acosta v. Mandros,
2024-Ohio-4891.] Mandamus—Inmate failed to state a mandamus claim because he had or has adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing complaint affirmed. (No. 2024-0040—Submitted July 23, 2024—Decided October 11, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-23-1252. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Kerr v. Pollex (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Boyd v. ToneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- State ex rel Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.