Legal Opinion
Rogulj v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1923No. 3942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alaska (Laws 1915, p. 146) provides that every employee coming within its provisions shall, at the time he is employed, or thereafter, furnish his employer with a written statement show*144ing the name or names of each and all persons entitled to benefits under the provisions of the act, in case of his death as the result of an injury received by him arising out of and in the course of his employment. A change of beneficiaries, and a chang'e of address of beneficiaries is likewise provided for. • When this statement has -been furnished, if…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Gorski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ohio Oil Co v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Petraska v. National Acme Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Seckman v. Wyo-Ben, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Taylor v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston, Mass.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Bodah v. Coeur D'Alene Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Hilty v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.