Noviant Oy v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge.
This matter is before this Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record Pursuant to Rule 56.2 (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”). The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion and memorandum in support thereof, Defendant’s and DefendanWIntervenor’s responses, Plaintiffs’ reply, the Administrative Record, and all other papers submitted herein, finds there is substantial evidence on the record to support the International Trade Commission’s (“ITC” or “Defendant”) decision to cumulate imports of purified carboxymethylcellulose (“CMC”) from Finland, Mexico, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Int'l Indus., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Tenaris Bay City, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025