Legal Opinion

Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 4, 1998No. 97-2150-JWLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs allege that certain hay harvesting machines sold in the United States by defendant New Holland North America, Inc. (“New Holland”) infringe upon U.S. Patent No. 5,272,859 (“ ’859 patent”), which is owned by plaintiff Hay and Forage Industries (“HFI”). The court held a Markman hearing on the matter on June 1, 1998, and subsequently issued an order construing the disputed claims of the ’859 patent. See Hay & Forage Indus. v. New Holland North America, Inc., 25 F.Supp.2d 1170, (D.Kan.1998). The matter is now before the court on four…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  3. Mixon v. Nevada Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  4. The Estate of Jill Ann Esche v. Renown Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API