Legal Opinion
Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 18, 1998No. 97-2150-JWLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs allege that certain hay harvesting machines sold in the United States by defendant New Holland North America, Inc. (“New Holland”) infringe upon U.S. Patent No. 5,272,859 (“ ’859 patent”), which is owned by plaintiff Hay and Forage Industries (“HFI”). The court held a Markman hearing on the matter on June 1, 1998, and subsequently issued an order construing certain disputed claims of the ’859 patent. See Hay & Forage Indus. v. New Holland North America, Inc., 25 F.Supp.2d 1170 (D.Kan.1998). The parties filed summary judgment motions and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Sandisk Corp. v. Lexar Media, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Hay & Forage Industries v. New Holland North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021