Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 21, 2005No. 1:04CV00832PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*477 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Applicant Trudy Nomm’s (“Nomm’s”) Motion to Intervene as a plaintiff. This case is a shareholder’s derivative action originally brought by Plaintiffs Judy Woodall (“Woodall”) and William Douglas Wright (“Wright”) against Defendants Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc., directors for Krispy Kreme, and certain other entities that entered business transactions with Krispy Kreme. The causes of action include breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, negligence, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth of Virginia, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Brink v. DaLesioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Bush v. ViternaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States of America, and Mary Laura Brookins v. South Bend Community School CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carcaño v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Diagnostic Devices, Inc. v. Taidoc Technology Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Fisher-Borne v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Hunter v. Town of MocksvilleDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Advancial Federal Credit Union v. CruzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.