Legal Opinion
Fisher-Borne v. Smith
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 14, 2014No. Nos. 1:12CV589, 1:14CV299PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, JR., District Judge.
Presently before this court is a motion to intervene by two parties, Thom Tillis, Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, and Phil Berger, President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate (collectively “Movants”). (1:12CV589 (Doc. 119); 1:14CV299 (Doc. 75).) In light of the positions of the parties and the procedural posture of this case, this court finds no just reason for delay with respect to this ruling. After considering their entitlement to intervention as of right or, alternatively, permissive intervention, this court grants the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JTH Tax LLC v. SerbusDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Middleton v. AndinoDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Thomas v. AndinoDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020