Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Virginia, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1976No. 76-1270PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUNZIG, Judge:

The Commonwealth of Virginia appeals the district court’s denial of Virginia’s motion to intervene under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2) in a suit by the Virginia Electric & Power Company (VEPCO) against Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse). VEPCO’s suit against Westinghouse is one of thirteen similar actions brought against Westinghouse, which have been combined and transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia for a coordinated and consolidated proceeding. Because denial of intervention will not impair or impede Virginia’s interests, and its interests are adequately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ordnance Container Corporation v. Sperry Rand Corporation, Cf & I Steel Corporation, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167 United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Francisco Pujol v. Shearson/american Express, Inc., Appeal of Ana Bonelli De PujolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Gould v. Alleco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. The Moosehead Sanitary District v. S. G. Phillips Corporation, Etc., State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API