Legal Opinion

People v. Camacho

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 2009No. B207048PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

A verdict form provided to the jury on a charge of robbery mistakenly identified the offense as carjacking. The mistake went unnoticed when the guilty verdict was read and the jury polled, and judgment was imposed as though the jury had returned a verdict of guilty of robbery. Because every stage of this case identified the offense as robbery — the charging document, the opening statement, arguments of counsel, and the jury instructions — we hold the jury’s intent to convict on robbery was unmistakably clear. The clerical error in the verdict form does not affect the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. TrotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. ReddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. EscarcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. FraustoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. People v. AshbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Avalos CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API